The word Pandemonium is hugely significant because it is a reference to the poem Paradise Lost by John Milton (9 December 1608 – 8 November 1674). Milton wrote this poem after losing his eyesight. Central to this poem is the fall of man at the hand of Adam and Eve, by the fallen angel (Satan) and that with the forced departure, paradise came to an end.
Thanks to Project Gutenberg, it is possible to read Paradise Lost by yourself. Do not be alarmed, as it involves no less than ten volumes. It is therefore safe to compare Milton’s work to that of another literary great: La Divina Commedia by Dante Alighieri (1265 – 1321). Even when it comes to theme, there are strong similarities between the two’s work. As in Alighieri’s work, the underworld, or rather hell, plays an emphatic role.
The question is who plays the lead role now? Is it Satan (The Prince of Darkness, Lucifer), is it Adam or is it Eve?
Another interpretation could be that the true hero of all this is simply Adam. Isn’t it he who was the first man on earth according to the Bible and thus had an edge anyway? He was able to ask for more because his request for a companion was granted. That led to the arrival of Eve. That story is described in the Bible and of course, we don’t need Milton for that. Unlike what happens in the Bible, so in Milton’s story, Adam gets a glimpse of the future. What lies ahead for humanity? A kind of: “You should have listened better!” moment you might say.
Then there is Eve. Milton portrays her precisely differently from what happens in the Bible. Perhaps even more rebellious. Isn’t this a woman who is the opposite? Perhaps it might even be argued that she is the one with more knowledge. In any case, enough to know that a relationship with Adam is only going to work when she has some time to herself at certain times. It is precisely at these moments that the anti-hero Milton introduced earlier, the Prince of Darkness, comes around the corner. In the guise of the snake. Then comes the well-known seduction. Yet it takes the necessary persuasion to get her to that act.
Does it stop there? Certainly not, as Michael could perhaps also be considered the protagonist. The archangel. He shows Adam what lies ahead for mankind. Moreover, he gets to send Adam and Eve away from Paradise after they eat the forbidden fruit. Only he is not the only archangel. For instance, there is also an archangel named Raphael. Perhaps he is more important than Michael because he was sent by God to Paradise to protect Adam and Eve from Satan. The story he then tells the two takes up a large part, so it is more plausible that this makes his position among the archangels more important. Yet Raphael fails to protect the two from the Fall to come. Perhaps this is because Raphael overvalues Satan in his story. This could be yet another proof that Milton thus designates Satan as the protagonist.
So what about God himself? Is it not logical to assume that Milton simply meant God the Father as the protagonist? Let’s face it, just like in the Bible, Milton believed that God too created everything. He even went so far as to argue that Satan with his army of fallen angels was incapable of overthrowing God in any way. Logical, anyone with a religious background will say. Others point out that despite this, his chair legs are being sawn away by Adam and Eve eating that forbidden fruit anyway. Before we get bogged down in a theological discussion: it could be Milton meant God as the protagonist.
Then there is someone else, who does not feature emphatically in all this. The son-of. Jesus Christ, in other words. Milton does not mention him by name. At most, he uses the word Son (capital, important) for interpretation. In this case, too, you could say: logical. Logical, because when you look at it from a Christian point of view: the story of Adam and Eve belongs in the Old Testament. That is not to say, by the way, that the story of Adam and Eve is bound to Christianity alone. According to the Hebrew Bible and according to the Qur’an, these were also the first people on earth. Except that Paradise Lost was written by John Milton and he was a Puritanist by birth. This is a breakaway from the Anglican Church, which, according to the followers of Puritanism, was too Vatican-centric or still contained too many elements of Roman Catholicism.
Yet that is not the only thing special about all this. You might think this is all about a story based on the one found in the Bible. That is partly true. Partly, because Milton’s work may also be regarded as criticism. For example, the criticism of marriage and the position of women. Wasn’t Eve the one who insisted on me time? Besides, it seriously seems that she was just a bit smarter than Adam. That might even be the case when it comes to that forbidden fruit. Again, it just doesn’t speak in her favour: when she wanted to talk to God, she was only allowed to do so through Adam.
Het kan ook zijn dat de kritiek gericht was tegen Charles I en niet in het bijzonder de monarchie.
As is the case in La Divina Commedia, there is a city present in hell in Paradise Lost. In Alighieri’s story, it is the city of Dis. This is where the violent are punished. This is the seventh circle of hell.
Milton has Michael tell him about the city of Pandæmonium (Pandemonium), the capital of hell. The name is a derivation of the Greek words all and demon. Together, therefore, you get all demons. The city was designed as a citadel by Mulciber, who previously designed all the heavenly palaces. That was before his fall from heaven. Mulciber is another name for the Roman god Vulcan, son of Jupiter and Juno and husband of Venus. According to the Romans, this was the god of volcanoes, fire, goldsmiths and blacksmiths. The origin of this god can be traced back to the Greek god Hephaistos, which in turn has Etruscan origins (Sethklans).
Already in the first part of the book, the city appears as “the High Capital, of Satan and his Peers.” This city is simultaneously too small to house all the fallen angels and demons, but at the same time, it is not. This has to do with the possibility of stripping those present in the city and thus reducing their size so that there is always enough space.
This city is not just any city, Milton compares it to a Biblical, holy place: King Solomon’s temple. The point then is that building a temple like this one could lead to immoral states. Some see this as proof that Milton is establishing a relationship between St Peter’s Basilica and the Pantheon in Rome. Both are examples of how he believes idolatry can go wrong. This would be consistent with his religious views on the matter.
Another option that could be possible is that the Pandæmonium should not be taken literally at all. That it would be about the position of the king. That it does not make sense that there could be some relationship between church and state or that a monarch should not appropriate that power because a religion would allow or enable it. Milton would thus reject the idea of a monarch being crowned on behalf of or by a religious leader.
Admittedly, that all sounds pretty intense for “just” a special day, doesn’t it? You might ask the question, “Is it all Pandemonium Day?” Does it have to be so ‘heavy’? Isn’t this a little too much of a good thing?
It’s just an excuse to just let everything go. That pile of papers you need to sort out? You’ll do that tomorrow. Cleaning the windows? You do that tomorrow. Only, it doesn’t have to stop there… it’s all about chaos.
If you feel the need to do something you wouldn’t normally do, you could do this. Don’t get me wrong, I am not calling for illegal things or disrupting things. Think of innocent things. Turn right instead of left, or vice versa. Combine colours you wouldn’t normally combine when it comes to clothes.
Where did it come from? Ha, maybe that’s the same chaos as the day itself. Its origins are unknown. More is known about Milton’s poem than about the origins of Pandemonium Day. Hence, you have mainly been able to read background information on Paradise Lost. Perhaps that fits well with Pandemonium Day. You expected something but got something else.